NanoFlashing™
C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™ questions, with the company’s answers and the sources they come from.
Last reviewed: .
What is NanoFlashing™?
NanoFlashing™ is a patented permanent positive polarity (3P) technology that attracts and captures negatively charged pollutants, including PFAS, ultrafine particles, wildfire smoke, and pollen.
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. Many airborne particles carry an electric charge, and many are negatively charged. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. Once attracted, the particle is captured by NanoFlashing™. When a captured pollutant has a fragile structure, NanoFlashing™ destroys it on contact through a physical mechanism. NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
What is the active ingredient in NanoFlashing™?
The term “active ingredient” belongs to pesticide registration, not to the company's description of NanoFlashing™: C-POLAR describes a charge, and states that the filter incorporates no substance or mixture of substances to perform its intended pesticidal purpose.
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The filter is intended to destroy the viruses, bacteria and fungal spores it captures. It destroys them on direct contact with the positive electric charge, by physical means, and only while the organism is captured by the positive electric charge. NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through. The company classifies the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter as a device under Section 2(h) of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. § 136(h), and 40 C.F.R. § 152.500(a), and its Statement of Regulatory Status under European Union law states: “It contains no active substance.” The company does not publish the composition of the media.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.6, 3.6 and 3.7, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 3.3, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.6, 3.6, 3.7, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 3.3, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
How does the published description distinguish polarity from a chemical reaction?
The published description calls polarity a physical property and says it does not rely on a chemical reaction.
The account on the NanoFlashing page runs in steps. Inside every atom, protons carry a positive charge and electrons carry a negative charge. When a heavier atom joins a lighter atom, they share electrons, and the heavier atom has a stronger pull on the shared electrons, drawing them away from the lighter atom and closer to itself. This uneven sharing creates a negative side and a positive side. This is called polarity. Polarity is a physical property, like density or weight. It is built into the molecular structure and does not rely on a chemical reaction. In NanoFlashing™, these molecular pairs are aligned in the same direction, with their positive sides facing outward and their negative sides tucked inside. Together, they create a permanent positive polarity.
A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
How does NanoFlashing™ attract negatively charged particles?
NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
Many airborne particles carry an electric charge, and many are negatively charged. Like a magnet, the positive polarity of NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The charge does not act on organisms only: in single-pass laboratory testing the filter captured pine-needle smoke and ultrafine particles better than the control filter, and smoke is neither a pest nor alive.
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.4 and 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
What does the description say happens after a pollutant is captured?
Once attracted, the particle is captured by NanoFlashing™, and when a captured pollutant has a fragile structure, NanoFlashing™ destroys it on contact through a physical mechanism.
The company's fuller statement of the same thing is in its Statement of Classification, at 2.6: “The filter is intended to destroy the viruses, bacteria and fungal spores it captures. It destroys them on direct contact with the positive electric charge, by physical means, and only while the organism is captured by the positive electric charge.” Intended, on direct contact, by physical means, and only while captured are the limits of that statement.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
What does the published description say about ozone and releases?
NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through.
The NanoFlashing page states it twice, at step 4 of the account and again under Permanent Positive Polarity: it generates no ozone and adds nothing to what passes through. The Statement of Classification states at 2.4 that in use the ventilation system's own fan moves air through the filter, that the filter is passive, that it draws no power and has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir, that it generates no ozone and emits nothing into the air passing through it, and that the air leaving the filter has had nothing added to it.
That is a statement about what the filter gives off. The company makes no claim about removing ozone from air that already carries it.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Does the published description call NanoFlashing™ passive?
Yes.
The published description calls NanoFlashing™ passive, in those words.
The NanoFlashing page states: “NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through.” The same page states that it doesn't run out, react or need a plug. The Statement of Classification states at 2.4 that the filter is passive, that it draws no power, and that it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir, and that the ventilation system's own fan moves the air through it.
The label for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter states that no power is required and that there is no by-product such as ozone. A complete air cleaner still has to move air, and the fan that does it belongs to the appliance or to the building's system.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
How does the Air page describe the filter's permanent positive polarity?
The Air page says the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter has a permanent positive polarity, a fixed positive charge.
It states that the filter attracts and captures ultrafine particles and wildfire smoke, with no power and no chemicals. The company's own statement of the same property is that NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself, that it is a physical property of the filter, and that the polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. Its statement of what the filter does to what it captures is the one at section 2.6 of the Statement of Classification: “The filter is intended to destroy the viruses, bacteria and fungal spores it captures. It destroys them on direct contact with the positive electric charge, by physical means, and only while the organism is captured by the positive electric charge.”
The Air page also names the two products built on that filter: INHALO™, a wall-mounted air cleaner built around a NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, and ReinFire™, a NanoFlashing™ Air Filter for homes and buildings. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
What does permanent positive polarity mean in the published description?
Permanent positive polarity is a fixed positive electric charge that is a physical property of the material.
The published description runs in steps. Inside every atom, protons carry a positive charge and electrons carry a negative charge. When a heavier atom joins a lighter atom, they share electrons, and the heavier atom has a stronger pull on the shared electrons, drawing them closer to itself. This uneven sharing creates a negative side and a positive side. This is called polarity. Polarity is a physical property, like density or weight. It is built into the molecular structure and does not rely on a chemical reaction. In NanoFlashing™, these molecular pairs are aligned in the same direction, with their positive sides facing outward and their negative sides tucked inside. Together, they create a permanent positive polarity. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
What evidence supports the published explanation of how the permanent polarity is created?
What the company measures is the charge itself.
The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request. The NanoFlashing manufacturing process produces the charge. The process acts on the filter by physical means. The science behind NanoFlashing™ was reviewed by other scientists and published by the American Society for Microbiology: Gong, Or, Sze et al., Microbiology Spectrum 12(9), e0409723, American Society for Microbiology, September 2024, doi 10.1128/spectrum.04097-23. That article is the authors' publication of the science, and the company does not present it as a measurement of the charge. The published step-by-step account of polarity is the company's description of the physical principle; the thing that is measured is the surface charge density. The paper reports laboratory results on SARS-CoV-2 in contact with treated textile, on aerosolised bovine coronavirus passed through a test filter in a wind tunnel, and on bacterial viability on treated textiles; each result belongs to the article that was tested.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — Validation
- Gong, Or, Sze et al., Microbiology Spectrum 12(9), e0409723, American Society for Microbiology, September 2024, doi 10.1128/spectrum.04097-23
Does the word nano mean the filter openings are nanosized?
The name is the company's name for the technology, and it does not describe the size of the openings in the media.
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The company does not publish a pore size for the media.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Does NanoFlashing involve flashes of light?
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir.
There is no light of any kind in how the material works. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Does the material need sunlight to function?
The material needs no sunlight and no other outside energy.
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Is NanoFlashing a battery-powered electrostatic filter?
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir.
There is no battery and no power of any kind. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. In a forced-air system, the system's own fan moves air through the filter.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Does positive polarity mean the product gives off positive ions?
NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through.
Nothing is given off. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The air leaving the filter has had nothing added to it.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
Is positive polarity the same thing as a positively charged electric wire?
The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest.
There is no wire, no current and no power supply. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The coulomb is the unit of electric charge. The National Institute of Standards and Technology gives the quantity the coulomb measures as “electric charge, amount of electricity.”
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI), NIST Special Publication 811 (2008 ed.), § 4.2.1, Table 3, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication811e2008.pdf.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI), NIST Special Publication 811 (2008 ed.), § 4.2.1, Table 3
Is NanoFlashing based on magnetism?
It works by electrostatic attraction, not magnetism.
Many airborne particles carry an electric charge, and many are negatively charged. Like a magnet, the positive polarity of NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The published comparison to a magnet describes how opposite charges pull together. It is a comparison, not a description of a magnetic material.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
Is this an electret material or a different kind of charged surface?
The company describes its material as a permanent positive polarity, and does not describe it as an electret.
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. The published contrast is with conventional electrostatic filters, whose charge fades in service. Industry standards ASHRAE 52.2 Appendix J and ISO 16890 test electrostatic filters after their temporary charge is removed, showing how they perform without it.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsDoes the name imply that loose nanoparticles are added to the air?
NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through.
Nothing is added to the air. The air leaving the filter has had nothing added to it. NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
Is a NanoFlashing treatment visible to the naked eye?
The company does not publish an appearance for the media.
What C-POLAR offers is the technology. NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. The look of a finished product is set by the partner that makes it: every commercial NanoFlashing™ product is made by a manufacturing partner, in their facility, in their format.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — About, https://cpolar.tech/about/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsDoes the material work only while air or water is moving?
The charge is there whether anything is moving or not.
The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. Particles reach the material when the air or the water carries them to it. In a forced-air system, the system's own fan moves air through the filter. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2, 2.4 and 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2, 2.4 and 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Does passive mean a complete purifier needs no fan or pump?
Passive describes the filter, not the system around it.
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. In a forced-air system, the system's own fan moves air through the filter. A complete air cleaner still has to move air: INHALO™, the wall-mounted air cleaner named on the Air page, is built around a NanoFlashing™ Air Filter and runs continuously at breathing height. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
Does permanent mean the material can recharge itself?
No. Permanent means the polarity is a fixed physical property: the NanoFlashing page states that it doesn’t run out, react or need a plug, and that “NanoFlashing™ does not fade.”
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The published contrast is with conventional electrostatic charges, which fade in service. The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request. The filter has service limits that have nothing to do with the charge: the label directs that it be replaced at the stated pressure drop or interval, and that it not be washed, vacuumed, brushed, blown out or reused.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, Directions for Use.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, Directions for Use
Is the material supposed to feel electrically charged when touched?
The company has not published anything about a sensation from touching the filter.
The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. A used filter is handled with care for a different reason. The label states: “A used filter holds the dust and microorganisms it has taken out of the air. Wear gloves, and eye protection and a dust mask where dust is heavy.”
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, Caution.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, Caution
Does the technology use ultraviolet light in any part of normal operation?
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir.
There is no ultraviolet light and no lamp. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Is NanoFlashing the same as photocatalytic oxidation?
It is a charge on the material, not a light-driven reaction.
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. When a captured pollutant has a fragile structure, NanoFlashing™ destroys it on contact through a physical mechanism.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.4 and 2.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.4 and 2.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
Is the treated material electrically conductive?
The company has not published a conductivity measurement for the material.
The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request. The company sets out the charge in its Statement of Classification. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. A request for a measurement the company has not published goes to [email protected], listed on the Contact page.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — Contact, https://cpolar.tech/contact/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — Contact
Does a NanoFlashing product need an earth connection?
The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir.
There is nothing to connect. The label directs that the filter be fitted into the filter track with the airflow arrow pointing toward the blower, and it carries no electrical step at all.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, Directions for Use.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, Directions for Use
Does the product create an electric field outside the filter housing?
The company has not published a measurement of an electric field outside the filter housing.
The company sets out the charge on the material in its Statement of Classification. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. A request for a measurement the company has not published goes to [email protected], listed on the Contact page.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — Contact, https://cpolar.tech/contact/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — Contact
Could a positive-polarity description be confused with pH or alkalinity?
Positive polarity here is an electric charge.
It is not a pH value and says nothing about acidity or alkalinity. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The coulomb is the unit of electric charge. The National Institute of Standards and Technology gives the quantity the coulomb measures as “electric charge, amount of electricity.”
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI), NIST Special Publication 811 (2008 ed.), § 4.2.1, Table 3, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication811e2008.pdf.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.2, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI), NIST Special Publication 811 (2008 ed.), § 4.2.1, Table 3
Does flash refer to how the material is manufactured or how quickly it performs?
The company uses the name for the technology and for the process that makes the charge, not for a speed.
The NanoFlashing manufacturing process produces the charge. The process acts on the filter by physical means. NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The company publishes no claim about how quickly the material acts.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
Can a filter be called antimicrobial even if its particle-removal rating is modest?
The company does not apply that word to its product.
Its published description is the mechanism. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. When a captured pollutant has a fragile structure, NanoFlashing™ destroys it on contact through a physical mechanism. A capture rating and a contact test measure different things. What a filter takes out of the air is measured in air, under ASHRAE 52.2 and ISO 16890. What happens to an organism held against a surface is measured by contact testing on a sample of material. A contact result is not an airborne filtration result, and neither one stands in for the other. The Viruses page shows airborne virus at 1.3 m/s airflow, NanoFlashing™ beside a control, and states: “NanoFlashing™ captures the virus, and destroys it.” The Mold page shows airborne mold spores at 1.6 m/s airflow, NanoFlashing™ beside a control, and states: “NanoFlashing™ captures the mold, and destroys it.” The Mold page also states that researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, in a study with funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health, tested NanoFlashing™ with more than 100 million live, dry spores driven in by fast-moving air.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Viruses, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/viruses/; C-POLAR — Mold, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/mold/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsIs NanoFlashing™ a chemical coating?
C-POLAR describes NanoFlashing™ as a physical property of the filter, and its Air page states that the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter works “through a physical mechanism, with no power and no chemicals.”
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The NanoFlashing manufacturing process produces the charge. The process acts on the filter by physical means. The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request. The NanoFlashing™ page states: “Polarity is a physical property, like density or weight. It is built into the molecular structure and does not rely on a chemical reaction.” A research paper or a patent records its authors' work in their own words, as it stood when it was written. NanoFlashing™ is patented, and the company does not publish the composition of the media or the particulars of the process.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 and 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.3, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
What is NanoFlashing™ made of?
The company does not publish the composition of the media; what it publishes is the property NanoFlashing™ gives the media, a permanent positive polarity.
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The NanoFlashing manufacturing process produces the charge. The process acts on the filter by physical means. A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. NanoFlashing™ is patented, and the company does not publish the particulars of the process.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
Is NanoFlashing just a coating?
C-POLAR describes NanoFlashing™ as a physical property of the filter, and its Air page states that the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter works “through a physical mechanism, with no power and no chemicals.”
NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. The NanoFlashing manufacturing process produces the charge. The process acts on the filter by physical means. The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request. The NanoFlashing™ page states: “Polarity is a physical property, like density or weight. It is built into the molecular structure and does not rely on a chemical reaction.” A research paper or a patent records its authors' work in their own words, as it stood when it was written. The company's description of the product it sells is the one in its Statement of Classification and on its website. NanoFlashing™ is patented, and the company does not publish the composition of the media or the particulars of the process.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
More questions on this subject
Mechanism boundaries and physical plausibility
- What happens to particles that carry little or no net charge?
- How would positively charged particles interact with the material?
- Does particle size change the relative importance of electrical attraction?
- Does the surrounding medium screen the proposed electrical interaction?
- How far from the material surface is the proposed attraction measurable?
- Can accumulated dust shield the underlying surface property?
- Does contact with a grounded metal support change the effect?
- Would stacking layers change the electrical interaction between them?
- Is charge distributed throughout a fibre or concentrated at its surface?
- Can a material have stable polarity while its measurable surface potential changes?
- Does the proposed interaction depend on the orientation of fibres?
- How is the effect distinguished from ordinary adhesion to fibres?
- Could humidity change particle charge without changing the material itself?
- Is an observed surface effect reversible when the surrounding conditions change?
- Is there evidence of charge transfer from captured particles to the material?
- Does adsorption saturate before the material loses its electrical property?
- What energy account accompanies any proposed change to a captured contaminant?
- Does the mechanism imply selectivity for one particle type over another?
- Can contact with oils mask the surface without removing the treatment?
- Would a smooth film and a fibrous substrate expose the same effective surface?
- Can the direction of airflow alter which treated surfaces are accessible?
- Does the proposed mechanism require direct contact with the treated surface?
- How can a mechanism model separate diffusion, interception and electrical attraction?
- What observation would count against the proposed mechanism rather than merely show low filtration?
- What is the published, testable meaning of “fragile structure” — which captured organisms qualify, and which do not?
Composition, material identity and disclosure
- What chemical or material identity is disclosed for each component of the offered medium?
- Is the same treatment used on every substrate sold under the technology name?
- Does the finished material contain an adhesive that is absent from the tested sample?
- Are processing aids present in the finished material or removed before sale?
- What information distinguishes intentionally added substances from trace impurities?
- Is there a product-specific declaration about intentionally added fluorinated substances?
- Is there a product-specific declaration about latex content?
- Is there a product-specific declaration about animal-derived ingredients?
- Can an independent reviewer obtain confidential composition details under an agreement?
- Does a safety data sheet describe the actual finished article or only an upstream ingredient?
- Are composition ranges narrow enough to support the claimed material equivalence?
- Is the treatment applied to one side of the substrate or both?
- Can colourants change between batches without changing the product code?
- Does a recycled-content substrate introduce a different impurity profile?
- What evidence distinguishes bonded material from loosely attached residue?
- Can manufacturing residues explain an odour in a newly opened package?
- Is moisture included when the treatment amount is reported by mass?
- Are the material's ingredients identified consistently across supplier documents?
- Can a customer obtain a declaration covering restricted substances in its intended market?
- Is there a documented method for reconciling confidential composition with emergency disclosure needs?
Charge measurements and instrument interpretation
- Which measured quantity is being described as polarity: potential, charge density or something else?
- Are the reported charge values traceable to calibrated instruments?
- Is measurement uncertainty large enough to change the conclusion about charge retention?
- How are readings affected by the distance between the instrument and the material?
- Was the instrument's measurement range appropriate for the reported signal?
- Does sample support material contribute to the measured electrical signal?
- Are both sides of a treated sheet measured?
- Are measurements mapped across a roll rather than taken only at its centre?
- Can the measurement distinguish a treated fibre from an untreated fibre in a mixed web?
- How is instrument drift detected during a measurement session?
- Is background electrical noise reported alongside low-level measurements?
- Can results from two different instrument types be compared directly?
- Are charge measurements normalised to area, mass or some other quantity?
- Does normalisation use the projected area or the true fibre surface area?
- Are storage measurements made under the same environmental conditions as the initial measurement?
- Can handling during sample preparation alter the quantity being measured?
- Is the uncertainty from sample-to-sample variation larger than instrument uncertainty?
- What reference material is used to check measurement repeatability?
- Can a laboratory reproduce the stated physical measurement without proprietary interpretive software?
- Does a pass in a charge test predict a pass in the claimed functional test?
- Is there a recognized standard written specifically for a “destroys on contact” claim on a solid article, separate from filtration-efficiency standards?
Physical aging and unusual environments
- Does permanent polarity specify the replacement interval of a finished filter?
- Does the aging evidence establish destruction after storage?
- What evidence supports any implication that the effect lasts for the lifetime of a finished product?
- What storage and handling limits apply before the product is installed?
- What would an ordinary buyer understand permanent to mean about performance, maintenance and replacement, and what supports that understanding?
- How would a user know that the product no longer meets a supported service condition or needs replacement?
- Does repeated condensation affect the treated material differently from steady high humidity?
- Can freeze-thaw cycles damage a water-contact version of the material?
- Does prolonged dry heat change the supporting fibres before it changes the treatment?
- Does sunlight affect exposed material differently from material inside a housing?
- Can prolonged contact with salt air alter the material or its frame?
- Does repeated flexing change performance even when the sheet looks intact?
- Can compression during storage permanently reduce permeability?
- Does contact with common packaging foam alter the surface property?
- Can oils from handling transfer to the treatment and change its function?
- Does vibration cause treatment loss independently of fibre breakage?
- Can static-discharge events change the material's measured properties?
- Is shelf aging accelerated by repeated opening of the storage package?
- Does a wet material recover its original performance after drying?
- Can an uninstalled filter be damaged by storage near solvents?
- Are temperature-cycle effects different from exposure at a constant temperature?
- Does treatment on a cut edge behave differently from treatment within the sheet?
- Can layers stick together after long storage under pressure?
- Does a visibly discoloured sample necessarily have altered performance?
- Can apparently unchanged material fail a functional test after environmental stress?
- How is cumulative exposure considered when several mild stresses occur together?
- Does the durability evidence cover repeated shipping between warehouses?
- Is a material rated for outdoor exposure or only protected indoor installation?
Older wording and changed descriptions
- What material claim changes have appeared in earlier website or product copy, and why were they made?
- Are materially different mechanism descriptions still being used in scientific, investor and jurisdiction-specific documents?
- What primary evidence explains the changes among the historical and current headline percentage claims?
- Have findings for other positive-charge materials been presented as demonstrated capabilities of a company product?
- What supports any assertion that legacy website, shop and partner claim problems have all been resolved?
- What changed in the product, claim or responsible entity between the April determination and the current public presentation?
- What evidence distinguishes a historical website finding from a claim that the same material is publicly available today?
- If a shop says active ingredient, is it naming a substance or using loose marketing language?
- If a page says eradicates pathogens on contact, what does on contact mean in that source?
- Could an older destruction claim refer to a different product configuration from a current capture claim?
- If a page disappears, can its removal date be separated from the date its claim was actually corrected?
- If an old page uses chemical-free, which interpretation of that phrase was intended?
- Can a statement about no added substances be confused with a statement about no substances in the material?
- Does permanent charge mean the same thing in a patent, a shop listing and a consumer explanation?
- Could a reseller's use of instant omit a time condition from the underlying evidence?
- If a video says kills everything, what narrower claim was it trying to summarise?
- Does a promotional diagram show an observed sequence or only a conceptual explanation?
- Could a positive-ion illustration imply an emission that the text does not claim?
- If two websites use identical wording, which one originated it?
- Can a third-party page remain discoverable after the author updates its main navigation?
- Does a screenshot include enough surrounding text to establish what the original page claimed?
- Could a search snippet combine a current title with outdated body text?
- Can a machine-translated page account for a mechanism term that appears nowhere in the source language?
- If an influencer says FDA approved, which specific document are they referring to?
- Could a forum's account of a recalled competitor product be mistakenly attached to C-POLAR?
- Does a claim that the formula changed have evidence beyond a change in public wording?
- Can a correction explain which earlier phrases remain accurate in a narrower context?
- If a retailer refuses to update a description, how can readers identify the disputed wording?
- Does a copied percentage retain the original target, endpoint and qualifier wherever it appears?
- If a patent or a research paper names a substance, is that what NanoFlashing™ is?
- Does the title of the peer-reviewed paper C-POLAR cites describe the product C-POLAR sells?
Worker health, handling and work organisation
- What exposure information applies to workers cutting, converting or handling the material?
- What information addresses airborne dust or fragments during converting and maintenance tasks?
- What task-specific assessment supports the recommended workplace controls and protective equipment?
- How are temporary staff and contractors informed of task-specific handling requirements?
- What route exists for reporting an unsupported claim or quality concern without it being lost in sales discussions?
- What evidence shows that a reported claim or quality issue was resolved before the affected copy or product continued?
- Can workers read the current safety information before starting a task?
- Does exposure assessment cover cleaning production equipment as well as normal operation?
- Are maintenance contractors informed about residues inside the machinery they service?
- Can workers report skin or respiratory symptoms without losing access to an investigation?
- Does the workplace assess manual-handling risks from large rolls or filter banks?
- Are local exhaust systems checked after production equipment is rearranged?
- Can pregnant workers obtain a confidential task-specific assessment?
- Does worker training explain what to do when a roll is damaged unexpectedly?
- Are temporary workers given the same practical training as permanent staff?
- Can workers recognise when task controls have failed?
- Does personal protective equipment fit the people assigned to use it?
- Are cleaning staff included in assessment of settled production dust?
- Can workers obtain translated instructions without relying on an unverified machine translation?
- Is there a defined response to repeated minor irritation complaints?
- Does a contractor's incident record reach the company responsible for the material?
- Can a worker request independent occupational-health advice about an exposure concern?
- Does the facility review ergonomic strain from repetitive filter assembly?
- Are waste-handling tasks assessed separately from handling unused material?
- Can production targets conflict with the time needed for required safety checks?
- Does a task change trigger retraining before a worker is reassigned?
- If the filter destroys what it catches, do maintenance staff still need gloves and a mask to change it?