Can a correction explain which earlier phrases remain accurate in a narrower context?

Can a correction explain which earlier phrases remain accurate in a narrower context?

The company holds one position, set out in the same sentences in its United States and European Union statements, and a narrower earlier phrase is read against it.

NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The filter is intended to destroy the viruses, bacteria and fungal spores it captures. It destroys them on direct contact with the positive electric charge, by physical means, and only while the organism is captured by the positive electric charge.

Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 to 2.6, NF Technical Products Inc.; Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1 to 2.6, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026.

Reviewed on 21 September 2026.