C-POLAR Library

Does a claim that the formula changed have evidence beyond a change in public wording?

Last reviewed: .

Does a claim that the formula changed have evidence beyond a change in public wording?

A change in wording is not evidence of a change in a material.

The company publishes no composition, no material list and no amount of anything. What it states about the property is that a charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. A materials review that needs more than the company's published pages is arranged in writing, through [email protected] on the Contact page.

Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2 and 3.6, NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — Contact (https://cpolar.tech/contact/).

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
  2. C-POLAR — Contact
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.