Does the mechanism imply selectivity for one particle type over another?
Last reviewed: .
Does the mechanism imply selectivity for one particle type over another?
The published sentence names negatively charged particles, and the Statement of Classification adds that the charge does not act on organisms only.
The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The Statement of Classification adds that the charge does not act on organisms only, and records that in single-pass laboratory testing the filter captured pine-needle smoke and ultrafine particles better than the control filter, and that smoke is neither a pest nor alive.
Capture by the charge and capture by the media are both part of what the filter does, and the company publishes no division of one from the other.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.1, 2.2 and 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™