Wildfire smoke
C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™ questions, with the company’s answers and the sources they come from.
Last reviewed: .
Is this product suitable for a designated clean-air room during wildfire smoke?
The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter is a panel filter for a forced-air system, and what it does in a room depends on that system.
The Air page states that ReinFire™ is made for homes and buildings facing wildfire smoke, and that INHALO™, a wall-mounted air cleaner built around a NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, is built to hold its airflow through a wildfire smoke season. Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles, the Validation page states: “In independent testing with real smoke from burning pine needles, NanoFlashing™ captured nearly 92% of ultrafine particles at 16.5 nanometres, far smaller than a coronavirus.” The report named for that testing is LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures; it is a laboratory result on that filter, not a result in a room. NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through. The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter is specified by nominal size, rated airflow and maximum face velocity, and its label states: “Results in a building depend on the system, the airflow, and how well the filter fits its track.” The label also states that the filter treats the air that passes through it, and that it works alongside ventilation and cleaning, not in place of them. A finished unit is chosen with the manufacturing partner that makes it, and the Terms of Use state that Site Content is not to be used to select, design, manufacture, validate, or make claims for a finished product. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
How should replacement planning account for a short but unusually heavy smoke event?
The label sets the replacement point: the pressure drop or the interval printed on the product, whichever comes first.
The Validation page states that NanoFlashing™ is built to maintain its polarity through a wildfire smoke event, and under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles it names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. A building's emergency plan is set by the people who run the building. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, ASHRAE 52.2 test duct. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Validation
- LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, ASHRAE 52.2 test duct
Can the filter still be useful when the outdoor smoke smell remains noticeable indoors?
Smoke particles and smoke smell are different things: the filter captures airborne particles, and the company makes no claim about a smell.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles, the Validation page names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” The published record covers airborne particles and the organisms named in it, and it covers no gas, no vapour and no odour.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsDoes evidence for wildfire particles apply to smoke from burning plastics?
The company publishes no result for smoke from burning plastics.
What the company states about what the filter takes out of the air is this. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The air items the company names are ultrafine particles, wildfire smoke and pollen.
The named air records are LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J, and Eurovent Certita Certification, Certificate No. 15.06.011, and each one covers the article and the conditions printed in it. Report 6847 is on a 24 × 24 × 30 in. pocket filter and Certificate No. 15.06.011 on a ten-pocket bag filter, not on a flat panel filter, and a rating belongs to the construction that was tested and to the conditions in the report. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” The company publishes no result for that pollutant, and it does not carry a result across to one a test did not cover. Certificate No. 15.06.011 can be looked up at source in the Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026, https://www.eurovent-certification.com/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- C-POLAR — Validation
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Would a filter used during wildfire smoke need inspection before ordinary service resumes?
The label sets when the filter is replaced, and it is not washed, vacuumed, brushed, blown out or reused.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles, the Validation page names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label directs replacement when the pressure drop reaches the value printed on the product, or at the interval printed on it, whichever comes first, and directs that the system not be run with no filter in the track. It also directs that the filter not be washed, vacuumed, brushed, blown out or reused. A filter left in service past that point is outside the instructions it was supplied with.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Validation
Could a smoke-loaded filter release odours after outdoor air improves?
The company makes no odour claim.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles, the Validation page names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” The published record covers airborne particles and the organisms named in it, and it covers no gas, no vapour and no odour.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsDoes evidence from a fresh smoke exposure apply to aged smoke transported over long distances?
A result belongs to the article and the conditions that were tested.
The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” They also state: “A test of C-POLAR material, a component, or a prototype does not establish the performance of a finished product that incorporates it. Construction, processing, storage, wear, cleaning, other components, and actual use may change the result.” and “Use evidence, specifications, instructions, and warnings specific to the actual finished product and use.”
What can be checked on any filter is the charge. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request.
The company’s published smoke testing used real smoke from burning pine needles: the Validation page names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and the Statement of Classification cites LMS Technologies, Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, which compared a pleated air filter of Aeropro media with C-POLAR against the same media without it. A published result belongs to the article that was tested, under the conditions named in the report that recorded it.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc., sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.5; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, ASHRAE 52.2 test duct; LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
- LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct
- C-POLAR — Validation
- LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, ASHRAE 52.2 test duct
Is a smoke-removal demonstration relevant to smoke entering a home continuously?
A demonstration is not the evidence.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles the records are LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J, and Eurovent Certita Certification, Certificate No. 15.06.011. Report 6847 is on a 24 × 24 × 30 in. pocket filter and Certificate No. 15.06.011 on a ten-pocket bag filter, not on a flat panel filter, and a rating belongs to the construction that was tested and to the conditions in the report. The Statement of Classification states at 2.5 that in single-pass laboratory testing the filter captured pine-needle smoke and ultrafine particles better than the control filter, and it cites LMS Technologies, Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, for that testing. The NanoFlashing page states: “Conventional electrostatic charges fade in service, dragging performance down with them.” It also states: “NanoFlashing™ does not fade.” The Terms of Use state: “Images and descriptions may show concepts or prototypes. They are not specifications, instructions, validation reports, recommendations, warranties, offers, promises, or commitments.” They also state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” The Validation page names the reports and certificates it lists with the institution and the number. An image is not the evidence. Certificate No. 15.06.011 can be looked up at source in the Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory. Each numbered report the company cites is named in text with its institution and number, not only shown in a picture.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 3 and 4, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct; Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026, https://www.eurovent-certification.com/. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation
- Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.5, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct
Could high indoor humidity during a smoke event change the filter's performance?
The label directs use in dry air only, and directs that the filter not be used anywhere the media may become wet; the company publishes no humidity result.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles the records are LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J, and Eurovent Certita Certification, Certificate No. 15.06.011. Report 6847 is on a 24 × 24 × 30 in. pocket filter and Certificate No. 15.06.011 on a ten-pocket bag filter, not on a flat panel filter, and a rating belongs to the construction that was tested and to the conditions in the report. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” They also state: “A test of C-POLAR material, a component, or a prototype does not establish the performance of a finished product that incorporates it. Construction, processing, storage, wear, cleaning, other components, and actual use may change the result.”
What can be checked on a sample after any handling is the charge. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest. It is measured as surface charge density, in nanocoulombs per square centimetre. The charge is measured on every production run, and the measurement can be repeated on any filter, upon request.
Certificate No. 15.06.011 can be looked up at source in the Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc., sections 2.2 and 2.3; Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026, https://www.eurovent-certification.com/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Validation
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
- Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
What happens if a filter supplier runs out of replacements during a regional smoke emergency?
A replacement filter is bought from the maker or the seller of the product, and this site holds no stock.
The Terms of Use state that the Site is informational only, and that it does not sell products, accept orders, quote binding prices, or process payments. The Terms of Use also name separate online stores, shop.cpolartechnologies.com and shopusa.cpolartechnologies.com, that are not part of the Site; a store and every purchase from it are governed only by the terms presented there. Those two stores are C-POLAR's own. Every commercial NanoFlashing™ product is made by a manufacturing partner, in their facility, in their format. The manufacturing partners named on the About and Air pages are Aero Pro, AQ Filter, BGE Indoor Air Quality Solutions, Olympic International and VOLZ Filters.
C-POLAR publishes no end-of-life notice period, no last-order arrangement and no storage life for held stock; those are terms of an agreement between the parties to it. The label instructs: “Store flat or on edge in the original packaging, indoors and dry, away from direct sunlight and moisture. Do not stack loads on the media.” NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 1 and 6, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — About, https://cpolar.tech/about/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — About
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
Can a filter marketed for smoke be assumed suitable for occupational firefighting protection?
No. The company publishes no result for firefighting, and it offers the filter for no work of that kind.
The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter is a panel air filter for forced-air heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems. The label sets where the filter is used: forced-air heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems in homes, businesses and institutions that take a panel filter of the stated size and run at or below the rated airflow and maximum face velocity.
Work controlled by a workplace or a remediation requirement is done with the equipment that requirement calls for, and the filter for it is chosen under that requirement by the people responsible for the work. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.”
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation
Would wildfire ash deposited indoors need separate cleanup despite operating the filter?
A filter acts on the air that passes through it, and it does not reach a surface or a source.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles, the Validation page names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. The label states: “This filter treats the air that passes through it.” It also states: “It works alongside ventilation and cleaning, not in place of them.” and “Results in a building depend on the system, the airflow, and how well the filter fits its track.” The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. A filter does not reach a surface, a deposit or a source.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Validation
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
Does wildfire smoke trapped in the filter come back out into the house later?
A used NanoFlashing™ filter holds the particles it has captured.
The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The Wildfire Smoke page states that the filter “captures and retains” wildfire smoke, and the Ultrafine Particles page states that it “captures and holds” ultrafine particles. The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label states: “A used filter holds the dust and microorganisms it has taken out of the air.” The company publishes no measurement of captured material coming back off a NanoFlashing™ filter into the air. The Validation page reports measurements in four buildings where NanoFlashing™ was installed; at a financial landmark in London, particulates, bioaerosols and energy were all measured lower after the air handling unit filters were changed to NanoFlashing™. Each is one building over one period, and it is not a result for another building.
Source: C-POLAR — Wildfire Smoke, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/wildfire-smoke/; C-POLAR — Ultrafine Particles, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/ultrafine-particles/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Wildfire Smoke
- C-POLAR — Ultrafine Particles
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Validation
Does NanoFlashing™ work on cigarette, tobacco or secondhand smoke, as distinct from wildfire smoke?
The company publishes no result for cigarette, tobacco or secondhand smoke, and it does not carry a result across to a pollutant a test did not cover.
The smoke named in the company's published record is wildfire smoke, and the smoke in its laboratory testing was smoke from burning pine needles. What that record names for air is ultrafine particles, wildfire smoke and pollen, and for smoke it names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.”
Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.
Reviewed on .
All questionsDoes a claimed effect on smoke include its gas phase?
The company's published smoke testing is about particles, and it makes no claim about the gas phase of smoke.
The Wildfire Smoke page states that much of wildfire smoke is made up of fine and ultrafine particles, and many carry an electric charge. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. The records named under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles on the Validation page are LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and LMS Technologies, Report 6847, 5 November 2024, ASHRAE 52.2-2017 with Appendix J, on a 24 × 24 × 30 in. pocket filter, and Eurovent Certita Certification, Certificate No. 15.06.011. The smoke report the company's statements cite is LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report, LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas or a vapour, and a measurement of particle capture says nothing about a gas. Certificate No. 15.06.011 can be looked up at source in the Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory.
Source: C-POLAR — Wildfire Smoke, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/wildfire-smoke/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026, https://www.eurovent-certification.com/; LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Wildfire Smoke
- C-POLAR — Validation
- Eurovent Certita Certification certified product directory, read 19 September 2026
- LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency, ASHRAE 52.2 test duct
Can a household rely on a room purifier while its HVAC fan is off?
A NanoFlashing™ panel filter in a forced-air system treats air only while that system's own fan moves air through it, and a complete air cleaner moves air itself.
Passive describes the filter, not the system around it. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. In a forced-air system, the system's own fan moves air through the filter. A complete air cleaner still has to move air: INHALO™, the wall-mounted air cleaner named on the Air page, is built around a NanoFlashing™ Air Filter and runs continuously at breathing height. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, About This Product.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label, About This Product
What information is needed to compare recirculation with bringing in smoky outdoor air?
The company publishes no comparison between recirculating and bringing in outdoor air.
The label instructs: “Do not use where this filter would restrict airflow beyond the system's specification.” It also states: “Improper installation can reduce airflow or damage the equipment.” and “Results in a building depend on the system, the airflow, and how well the filter fits its track.” The filter is specified by nominal size, rated airflow and maximum face velocity.
C-POLAR publishes no pressure-drop curve, no thermal model and no control logic for a building. The design, the redundancy and the alarms of that system belong to the people who run it. How a system behaves when its filters change is decided by that system, and the label sets the filter's own limits.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 6, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
Can evacuation-centre capacity be based on the number of filters installed?
The company publishes no occupancy figure and no capacity figure.
The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter is specified by nominal size, rated airflow and maximum face velocity, and its label states: “Results in a building depend on the system, the airflow, and how well the filter fits its track.” The label also states that the filter treats the air that passes through it, and that it works alongside ventilation and cleaning, not in place of them. A finished unit is chosen with the manufacturing partner that makes it, and the Terms of Use state that Site Content is not to be used to select, design, manufacture, validate, or make claims for a finished product.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
Would a filter address combustion gases after an indoor fire?
The company publishes no result for a combustion gas.
Under wildfire smoke and ultrafine particles, the Validation page names LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.” The published record covers airborne particles and the organisms named in it, and it covers no gas, no vapour and no odour.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsCan the product be used during building fire cleanup under the proposed use instructions?
The label sets where the filter is used: forced-air heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems in homes, businesses and institutions that take a panel filter of the stated size and run at or below the rated airflow and maximum face velocity.
The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter is a panel air filter for forced-air heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems. The company publishes no result for fire cleanup, and it offers the filter for no work of that kind.
Work controlled by a workplace or a remediation requirement is done with the equipment that requirement calls for, and the filter for it is chosen under that requirement by the people responsible for the work. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.”
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
Does a community clean-air programme need spare fans as well as spare filters?
The filter is passive and moves no air of its own.
Passive describes the filter, not the system around it. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. In a forced-air system, the system's own fan moves air through the filter. A complete air cleaner still has to move air: INHALO™, the wall-mounted air cleaner named on the Air page, is built around a NanoFlashing™ Air Filter and runs continuously at breathing height. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
Which indoor-air concerns fall outside the evidence supplied for this product?
The published record covers airborne particles and the organisms named in it, and it covers no gas, no vapour and no odour.
The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. On the Validation page the viruses are SARS-CoV-2, human coronavirus 229E, Coxsackievirus B6, bovine coronavirus, pseudo-type SARS-CoV-2, influenza A H3N2 and Phi6 bacteriophage; the bacteria are Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis; the fungi are Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus brasiliensis, Aspergillus niger and Candida albicans.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one. A pollutant that is not named in a published record is not covered by one. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.”
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsWould this product address carbon dioxide buildup in a closed room?
C-POLAR makes no claim that the filter reduces carbon dioxide.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one.
NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. General enquiries go to [email protected].
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsWould it address carbon monoxide from a faulty appliance?
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one.
Carbon monoxide is a gas, and it is detected by a carbon monoxide alarm, not by a filter. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. General enquiries go to [email protected]. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsWhat evidence applies to radon rather than airborne particles?
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for radon.
C-POLAR publishes no evidence for a gas, a vapour or an odour, and it makes no claim about one.
NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction. General enquiries go to [email protected].
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
All questionsMore questions on this subject
What a buyer wants removed
- Does the proposed filter remove formaldehyde from indoor air?
- Does it remove nitrogen dioxide associated with combustion?
- Can it address gaseous ozone already present in incoming air?
- What evidence applies to cooking grease aerosols?
- What evidence applies to ultrafine traffic particles?
- Does the material capture airborne microplastic fibres?
- Can it reduce airborne pet dander in the size range relevant to my room?
- Does it capture pollen fragments as well as intact pollen grains?
- What evidence concerns dust-mite allergen rather than general dust?
- Would it remove airborne fungal fragments after a mould problem has been repaired?
- Can it address particles generated by a home laser printer?
- What evidence concerns soldering fumes in a workshop?
- Does a filtration claim include particles from candle burning?
- Would it address aerosolised cleaning-product droplets?
- Can it remove asbestos fibres under an approved remediation use?
- What evidence applies to respirable crystalline silica in a workplace?
- Does the proposed product address airborne lead-containing dust?
- Can it remove aerosol particles without removing the smell associated with them?
- Would it reduce pet allergens already deposited on furniture?
- Can a filter address a continuing source of dampness or mould growth in a wall?
- Will the pollen the filter catches blow back out when the furnace turns on?
Airflow, fans and whole-system behaviour
- What evidence applies to the actual installed system rather than a material sample?
- What measured pressure drop and airflow data apply to the exact filter configuration I plan to specify?
- Does a reported rating depend on conditioning or charge state that differs from the marketed configuration?
- Does a laboratory result tell me how the complete product will perform in my room or water system?
- How do sealing, bypass, frame design and installation orientation affect the assembly evidence?
- What documented checks are needed after installation to confirm fit and operation?
- What evidence supports any claimed energy saving after accounting for actual airflow and filter loading?
- What temperature, humidity and loading limits are documented for the proposed installation?
- Could this retrofit affect equipment approval, service obligations or the equipment manufacturer's warranty?
- Who is responsible for commissioning, maintenance records and later changes to the installed configuration?
- How does the filter change the operating point on my fan's performance curve?
- Will the existing motor draw more current after this retrofit?
- Could reduced airflow cause a cooling coil to freeze?
- Could the proposed filter create excessive pressure in a return-air plenum?
- Does filter loading shift air between parallel branches of a duct system?
- Can a bank of filters be balanced if individual units have different resistance?
- Does a variable-speed fan compensate for loading within its available range?
- What happens to delivered clean airflow when the fan runs at its quiet setting?
- Is rated airflow specified for a clean filter or a loaded filter?
- Does changing pleat spacing alter the usable filtration area?
- Can a prefilter protect the treated layer without restricting the system too much?
- How does a downstream filter interact with the pressure loss of this material?
- Is the filter suitable for airflow that reverses direction during normal operation?
- Could a tightly packed installation prevent air from reaching part of the filter face?
- What effect does filter-frame deflection have at maximum airflow?
- Does the unit maintain its shape during fan startup and shutdown?
- Can pulsed airflow produce a different performance result from steady flow?
- How does duct leakage affect any predicted room benefit?
- Does a supply-air installation perform differently from a return-air installation for the same room?
- Can a filter retrofit change the balance between supply and exhaust ventilation?
- Does operation at altitude change the sizing assumptions?
- Can fan noise increase even if the filter itself has no moving parts?
- What usable airflow remains when the filter reaches its stated replacement condition?
- Can a supplier provide performance curves rather than a single nominal operating point?
- Will it choke the airflow in my furnace the way a HEPA filter can?
Home installation and placement
- What exactly am I buying, and what does the stated performance result mean for that product?
- How do I confirm that the proposed filter fits and operates within the customer's equipment limits?
- Will this filter fit a slot labelled with a nominal size rather than the measured size?
- Can I use this in a ductless mini-split system?
- Can it replace the filter in a window air conditioner?
- Is there a compatible version for a portable purifier I already own?
- Can I use the material in a homemade box-fan air cleaner?
- Would cutting a sheet to fit leave an unsupported edge?
- Can the filter touch the fan guard safely in the intended assembly?
- Where should a room unit sit when furniture blocks direct airflow?
- Can I put a portable unit inside a cupboard with a vented door?
- Will one unit serve several rooms when the doors are closed?
- Does an open-plan room need a different placement approach from a small bedroom?
- How does an open window change the expected benefit of the installed unit?
- Can a filter be fitted if the existing slot has no secure retaining clip?
- Does the airflow arrow refer to the frame or the treated layer?
- Can two thin filters be stacked in a slot intended for one thick filter?
- Is an adapter frame available for an older heating system?
- Can a renter install this without making permanent alterations?
- Will installation require tools or skills beyond routine filter replacement?
- Can the unit operate safely in a bathroom's damp environment?
- Does placing a unit close to curtains obstruct its intake?
- Can a household unit be positioned near a stove without exceeding its intended conditions?
- Does the installation need a clear space for later filter removal?
- Can I put a NanoFlashing filter in my HEPA air purifier?
- Do you make a NanoFlashing replacement filter for portable HEPA air cleaners?
- What MERV rating and size do I need to buy for my home furnace, and does it come in standard filter sizes?
- Does installing the filter require a certified or licensed installer, or can any HVAC technician or homeowner do it?
- Could the filter cause the dark dust marks (“ghosting”) on walls and ceilings near air vents that some electrostatic filters are known to cause?
Daily operation and troubleshooting
- What documented factors determine inspection and replacement for the installed product?
- Can I wash or reuse the product, and what evidence supports the stated care instructions?
- Which cleaning or maintenance steps could change the claimed performance or invalidate the warranty?
- Does a filter-change light measure actual loading or simply elapsed time?
- Can a visibly clean filter still need replacement?
- Does a darker filter mean it is performing better or merely collecting more dust?
- What should I check if the unit begins to whistle after a filter change?
- Could a rattling noise indicate an unsecured frame?
- What should I do if the replacement filter arrives slightly bent?
- Can a filter with a small tear remain in service pending replacement?
- Does a sudden drop in pressure across the filter indicate damage rather than improvement?
- What could explain a new odour immediately after installation?
- Can I pause a replacement reminder while the building is unoccupied?
- Should operating hours be counted if the fan runs intermittently?
- Can a pressure sensor become blocked and give a misleading maintenance signal?
- What maintenance record should follow a filter moved to a different unit?
- Can several partly used filters be rotated between systems?
- Does removing loose dust with a vacuum affect the treated layer?
- Can compressed-air cleaning damage the material or release collected particles?
- Is an approved outer prefilter cleaned separately from the treated layer?
- How should a unit be restarted after a long shutdown?
- Should a filter be replaced after a building flood even if it later dries?
- Can the frame be reused after the media is replaced?
- How can I check that a service contractor installed the specified replacement?
- Does a replacement filter require resetting the system's airflow controls?
- Will germs puff out of the filter when I take the old one out?
- Can an existing UV light or ionizer in an HVAC system keep running alongside a NanoFlashing™ filter?