Does a monitoring plan use instruments accurate enough for the acceptance threshold?
Last reviewed: .
Does a monitoring plan use instruments accurate enough for the acceptance threshold?
The company publishes no monitoring method and no acceptance threshold.
The Validation page describes each installation by its kind and its place, and gives its period: a public hospital in Vancouver over twelve months from July 2023 to July 2024, a financial landmark in London over six months from March 2024 to September 2024, a major international airport in the United States over one month in August 2025, and a public university in Melbourne over one month in October 2024. What the company does publish about measurement at working sites is on the Validation page: since 2020 NanoFlashing™ has been installed in hospitals, airports, banks and universities, and independently measured with MicronView's 405 nm Bio-fluorescent Air Monitoring System, which distinguishes biological particles from inert dust in real time. The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.”
Which instrument is accurate enough for a threshold is decided by the people who set that threshold, against the instrument's own specification.
Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/. A question about a particular product or market can be sent to [email protected] or +1 604 630 6830.
Reviewed on .
All questions