How could the proposed material affect package barrier performance, seal integrity or shelf-life claims?
Last reviewed: .
How could the proposed material affect package barrier performance, seal integrity or shelf-life claims?
The company publishes no barrier result, no seal-integrity result and no shelf-life claim.
Food packaging and water are research applications on this site, and the company publishes no market position for either. The Terms of Use state that, as of their effective date, the Water, Textiles, Food packaging, and Medical devices chapters describe Research Applications, and that they do not describe finished products currently available from C-POLAR for those uses. They also state: “A test of a material, component, sample, or prototype does not establish the safety, efficacy, suitability, durability, compatibility, manufacturability, scalability, or performance of a finished product.” and that images and descriptions may show concepts or prototypes, which are not specifications, instructions, validation reports, recommendations, warranties, offers, promises, or commitments. The Food packaging chapter states that NanoFlashing™ Food Packaging has a permanent positive polarity, a fixed positive charge.
The one food comparison the company publishes is the Strawberry Test: three strawberries held at 26°C for thirteen days, one stored in a glass jar, one wrapped in polyester, and one wrapped in NanoFlashing™ Food Packaging. That is a comparison of three strawberries under one stated condition, and it is not a barrier measurement, a seal test or a shelf-life figure for any packaged food.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 3 and 4, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Food, https://cpolar.tech/food-packaging/. A materials review that needs more than the company's published pages is arranged in writing, through [email protected] on the Contact page.
Reviewed on .
All questions