Does a factory's corrective action address the cause of a defect rather than only retesting stock?
Last reviewed: .
Does a factory's corrective action address the cause of a defect rather than only retesting stock?
The quality system that controls a production line belongs to the manufacturer that runs it, and C-POLAR publishes none of its procedures.
Every commercial NanoFlashing™ product is made by a manufacturing partner, in their facility, in their format. What a corrective action must address, and whether retesting stock closes it, sit inside that manufacturer's system. The Terms of Use state: “A prospective partner or manufacturer must perform its own testing, validation, compatibility work, safety review, risk review, and quality controls for its proposed product and use.”
Source: C-POLAR — About, https://cpolar.tech/about/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 5 and 6, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.
Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.