Are overrides supported by a documented technical disposition?
Last reviewed: .
Are overrides supported by a documented technical disposition?
What counts as a defect is set by the specification in the agreement that governs the delivery, and C-POLAR publishes no defect classification.
Every commercial NanoFlashing™ product is made by a manufacturing partner, in their facility, in their format. Whether a departure from a specification is written up and justified before material is released is set inside that manufacturer's own quality system and by the agreement that governs the delivery. The Terms of Use state: “A prospective partner or manufacturer must perform its own testing, validation, compatibility work, safety review, risk review, and quality controls for its proposed product and use.”
Source: C-POLAR — About, https://cpolar.tech/about/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 5 and 6, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.
Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.