What actions would follow if a competent authority rejected the claimed route or found that the advertised performance was unsupported?

What actions would follow if a competent authority rejected the claimed route or found that the advertised performance was unsupported?

The company publishes no plan for that case; its position is the one it sets out in its Statement of Regulatory Status.

The Statement of Regulatory Status records how the company applies Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 to the filter. It addresses that question only, and it states no efficacy data. The filter is not a biocidal product and not a treated article. The company therefore classifies the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter as neither a biocidal product nor a treated article. No authorisation, approval, notification or registration under the Regulation is required. No prior decision of any authority is required. The company classifies the filter itself.

Source: C-POLAR Technologies, Inc. — Statement of Regulatory Status for NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, 11 September 2026.

Reviewed on 21 September 2026.