If a treated-article route is asserted, what documents establish each relevant Article 58 condition for this exact article?

Last reviewed: .

If a treated-article route is asserted, what documents establish each relevant Article 58 condition for this exact article?

The company does not assert a treated-article route.

The Statement of Regulatory Status states at 3.5: “The filter has not been treated with a biocidal product and does not incorporate one, as stated at 3.3 and 3.4. It is therefore not a treated article, and the final sentence of Article 3(1)(a), ‘A treated article that has a primary biocidal function shall be considered a biocidal product’, does not apply to it.” The company therefore classifies the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter as neither a biocidal product nor a treated article. Article 58 applies to treated articles, and the company does not place the filter on the market as one.

Source: C-POLAR Technologies, Inc. — Statement of Regulatory Status for NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, 11 September 2026.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR Technologies, Inc. — Statement of Regulatory Status for NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, 11 September 2026
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.