What supports absolute wording about ozone under every condition a buyer would reasonably infer?

What supports absolute wording about ozone under every condition a buyer would reasonably infer?

The company's ozone statement is about what the filter gives off, and it rests on the filter having nothing that could generate ozone.

NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through. The Statement of Classification states at 2.4 that in use the ventilation system's own fan moves air through the filter, that the filter is passive, that it draws no power, and that it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir, and that it generates no ozone and emits nothing into the air passing through it. The label for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter states that no power is required and that there is no by-product such as ozone. The polarity is a positive electric charge at rest, and the charge is measured on every production run.

That statement does not extend to ozone already present in the air entering the filter. The company makes no claim about removing ozone from air that already carries it.

Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.2 and 2.4, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.

Reviewed on 21 September 2026.