What evidence addresses skin-contact compatibility for the intended garment and wearing conditions?

Last reviewed: .

What evidence addresses skin-contact compatibility for the intended garment and wearing conditions?

For skin contact, the company names Product Safety Labs, Study 65323 (skin irritation) and Study 65324 (dermal sensitisation), and OEKO-TEX® Standard 100, Product Class II, Certificate 17.0.25812; it publishes no result for a particular garment under its wearing conditions.

The Validation page states that NanoFlashing™ is tested under Good Laboratory Practice to US EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines, and it names Product Safety Labs, Study 65321, Study 65322, Study 65323 and Study 65324. Each was completed in 2024 and each was run on a sponsor-supplied sample. Each of the four covers one endpoint. Product Safety Labs, Study 65323, completed 16 February 2024, reported that the material it tested “is classified as non-irritating to the skin”, and Study 65324, completed 31 January 2024, reported that the material it tested “is not considered to be a contact sensitizer”; each result describes that sample under that study’s conditions. The Validation page also states that NanoFlashing™ is certified to OEKO-TEX® Standard 100, Product Class II, the class for products in direct contact with skin, and names OEKO-TEX Service GmbH, Certificate 17.0.25812.

Each of those studies describes one endpoint, on that sample, under those conditions. None of them establishes an agency approval, a general safety conclusion, an inhalation result or a health outcome, and irritation and sensitisation are separate endpoints answered by separate studies. A copy may be made available on our review of the request. Confidentiality obligations may apply to a given report. Certificate 17.0.25812 can be checked at source in OEKO-TEX’s public label check.

Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; Product Safety Labs, Study 65321, Study 65322, Study 65323 and Study 65324, 2024, US EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; OEKO-TEX Label Check, read 19 September 2026, https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/label-check.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — Validation
  2. Product Safety Labs, Study 65321, Study 65322, Study 65323 and Study 65324, 2024, US EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines
  3. C-POLAR — Terms of Use
  4. OEKO-TEX Label Check, read 19 September 2026
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.