Would a bedding application need different comfort evidence from a garment application?
Last reviewed: .
Would a bedding application need different comfort evidence from a garment application?
The company publishes no comfort evidence for bedding or for garments, and it does not carry one to the other.
The page states: “The NanoFlashing™ Textile has a permanent positive polarity, a fixed positive charge,” and that the fabric stays waterproof, breathable, strong and washable. Those four are what the company publishes about what the fabric retains. It publishes no measurement of drape, stretch recovery, wicking, warmth, colour fastness, whiteness, hand feel, fabric noise or tear strength, and it does not carry a result across to a property a test did not cover.
The Terms of Use state that, as of their effective date, the Textiles chapter describes a Research Application, and that it does not describe a finished product currently available from C-POLAR for that use. They also state: “A test of a material, component, sample, or prototype does not establish the safety, efficacy, suitability, durability, compatibility, manufacturability, scalability, or performance of a finished product.” A materials review is arranged in writing, through [email protected] on the Contact page.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Textile, https://cpolar.tech/textile/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 3 and 4, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Contact, https://cpolar.tech/contact/.
Reviewed on .
All questions