Does a sportswear claim about odour control have evidence separate from a surface antimicrobial result?
Last reviewed: .
Does a sportswear claim about odour control have evidence separate from a surface antimicrobial result?
The company publishes no odour result and makes no odour claim.
The Validation page names what was tested, the conditions and the institutions, and gives report and certificate numbers for the air-filtration, certification and safety records, and the organisms in that record are the viruses, bacteria and fungi listed on it. What it states is about particles and about the organisms it names. NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction. The published record covers airborne particles and those organisms, and it covers no gas, no vapour and no odour.
The Terms of Use state: “A reported result describes only what the identified test found.”
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questions