Can a Hong Kong procurement team distinguish a local test report from a local product approval?
Last reviewed: .
Can a Hong Kong procurement team distinguish a local test report from a local product approval?
A test report records what one test found.
It is not an approval, and no authority has approved the filter.
The Terms of Use state: “A citation, quotation, name, logo, link, or third-party test does not by itself mean that the third party sponsors, endorses, certifies, or approves C-POLAR, a C-POLAR product, a Site claim, or a proposed use.” They also state that no one may “State or imply that C-POLAR has approved, endorsed, licensed, partnered with, or verified you, your organization, or your product, when it has not.” The Validation page names each report and certificate in its tested and certified list by institution and number, so a report can be identified and checked with its issuer. An institution's name is not a result; the test, the article and the standard are.
No authority has approved, registered, endorsed or cleared the filter. The company classifies its own article, and it sets out that classification under United States law and under Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 only.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 7 and 9, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 3.7, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
- Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026