C-POLAR Library

Does a Traditional Chinese label preserve the intended technical distinction between capture and destruction?

Last reviewed: .

Does a Traditional Chinese label preserve the intended technical distinction between capture and destruction?

The company uses two verbs for two things: on the NanoFlashing page, “the positive polarity of NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction”, and “When a captured pollutant has a fragile structure, NanoFlashing™ destroys it on contact through a physical mechanism.”

A translation that leaves out the mechanism does not state the company's position. The published Terms of Use state: “Nothing on the Site authorizes anyone to manufacture, integrate, market, resell, or describe a product as C-POLAR-enabled. Nothing authorizes anyone to describe itself as a C-POLAR partner. Written permission is required.” General enquiries go to [email protected].

Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
  2. C-POLAR — Terms of Use
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.