C-POLAR Library

Can a journalist distinguish a regulator's investigation from a final adverse finding?

Last reviewed: .

Can a journalist distinguish a regulator's investigation from a final adverse finding?

Yes: an investigation or an enquiry is not a finding.

A register entry identifies what was entered on it and nothing else. The Terms of Use state: “A citation, quotation, name, logo, link, or third-party test does not by itself mean that the third party sponsors, endorses, certifies, or approves C-POLAR, a C-POLAR product, a Site claim, or a proposed use.” They also state: “Use evidence, specifications, instructions, and warnings specific to the actual finished product and use.” No authority has approved, registered or endorsed the filter, and the company classifies its own article.

Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 3 and 7, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — Terms of Use
  2. Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.