Can a reader identify the scientist responsible for the technical interpretation?
Last reviewed: .
Can a reader identify the scientist responsible for the technical interpretation?
The authors of the published paper are named on it, and a laboratory report is the document of the body that issued it.
The Validation page names each report and certificate in its tested and certified list by institution and number, including LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J, Intertek Building & Construction, Report 105175501SAT-001, Product Safety Labs, Studies 65321 to 65324, and RST Rail System Testing, Reports P60-22-0003 and P60-24-0297. A copy is not automatic, and confidentiality obligations may apply to a given report. The Terms of Use state: “A citation, quotation, name, logo, link, or third-party test does not by itself mean that the third party sponsors, endorses, certifies, or approves C-POLAR, a C-POLAR product, a Site claim, or a proposed use.”
Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 7, https://cpolar.tech/terms/. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.
Reviewed on .
All questions