What measured evidence supports each environmental claim across the product's lifecycle?
Last reviewed: .
What measured evidence supports each environmental claim across the product's lifecycle?
The company makes no environmental claim across the lifecycle, so there is no such claim to support.
The company publishes no lifecycle assessment and no footprint calculation. The one before-and-after energy measurement it publishes is on the Validation page, for a financial landmark in London over six months from March 2024 to September 2024, measured before and after the air handling unit filters were changed to NanoFlashing™; that is one building over one period, and it is not a lifecycle measurement. The Validation page also names Eurovent Certita Certification, Certificate No. 15.06.011, which certifies a ten-pocket bag filter at ISO ePM1 70% with an A class energy rating; a rating belongs to the construction that was tested. The company also states that the filter in use generates no ozone and emits nothing into the air passing through it; that statement is about the air passing through the filter, and it is not a lifecycle measurement.
Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Validation
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc.