Does the evidence distinguish food quality from food safety?

Last reviewed: .

Does the evidence distinguish food quality from food safety?

The company’s pathogen evidence is about what the material does to viruses, bacteria and fungal spores; the one food comparison it publishes is the Strawberry Test, and it publishes no food-safety assessment.

The Validation page names the organisms tested, the conditions tested and the institutions that tested them. A reported result describes only what the identified test found. The company’s own food page makes the point that a package can suppress the bacteria that warn us food is spoiling, while a dangerous pathogen keeps growing unseen. As of the Effective Date, the Water, Textiles, Food packaging, and Medical devices chapters describe Research Applications. They do not describe finished products currently available from C-POLAR for those uses. A report covers the article, the method and the conditions named in it.

Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Food, https://cpolar.tech/food-packaging/.

Reviewed on .

All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.