Could packaging delay visible spoilage without supporting a longer safe storage period?
Last reviewed: .
Could packaging delay visible spoilage without supporting a longer safe storage period?
The company makes no storage-period claim for any food.
The one food comparison the company publishes is the Strawberry Test: three strawberries held at 26°C for thirteen days, one stored in a glass jar, one wrapped in polyester, and one wrapped in NanoFlashing™ Food Packaging. The film on the page labels the strawberry in a glass jar “Expired on Day 2”, the one in polyester “Expired on Day 3”, and the one wrapped in NanoFlashing™ Food Packaging “Expired on Day 12”. The Terms of Use state: “Images and descriptions may show concepts or prototypes. They are not specifications, instructions, validation reports, recommendations, warranties, offers, promises, or commitments.” A reported result describes only what the identified test found. Date marking, storage conditions and the instructions printed on a package are set by the food producer and the maker of the package.
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Food, https://cpolar.tech/food-packaging/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questions