Would a minimum advertised-price policy require review separate from a recommended retail price?
Last reviewed: .
Would a minimum advertised-price policy require review separate from a recommended retail price?
This site publishes no resale price, no supply term and no channel restriction, and it sells no products.
The published Terms of Use state: “The Site is informational only. It does not sell products, accept orders, quote binding prices, or process payments.” They also state: “Unless a Separate Agreement expressly says otherwise, C-POLAR is not the manufacturer or seller of a finished product merely because that product uses or refers to C-POLAR technology.” C-POLAR does not publish the terms of its supply or distribution agreements, and it publishes no exclusivity, no advertised-price policy, no tie to another contract and no channel restriction, online or offline. The published Terms of Use state: “Accessing the Site or contacting C-POLAR through the Site does not create a partnership, agency, joint venture, distribution right, supply commitment, license, exclusive right, or other business relationship.” They add: “A prospective partner may rely only on a commitment stated in a Separate Agreement.” General enquiries go to [email protected]. A price and the terms attached to it come from the manufacturing partner or the seller that makes the offer, and a purchase from a separate online store is governed only by the terms presented there. The Terms of Use name two such stores, shop.cpolartechnologies.com and shopusa.cpolartechnologies.com; those two stores are C-POLAR's own. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .