What record shows whether a Canadian classification assessment considered released substances as well as the intended surface action?

What record shows whether a Canadian classification assessment considered released substances as well as the intended surface action?

The company publishes no Canadian classification record.

Both the Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter and the Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter state: “In use, the ventilation system's own fan moves air through the filter. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. It generates no ozone and emits nothing into the air passing through it. The air leaving the filter has had nothing added to it.” They also state: “A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances.” On the intended action they state that the filter is intended to destroy the viruses, bacteria and fungal spores it captures, and that it destroys them on direct contact with the positive electric charge, by physical means, and only while the organism is captured by the positive electric charge. The company sets out its position under United States law and under Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, and under no other country's law.

Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc., and Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026.

Reviewed on 21 September 2026.