Can Canadian test documentation identify the same product code used on local retail packaging?
Last reviewed: .
Can Canadian test documentation identify the same product code used on local retail packaging?
Test documentation names what was tested, and matching it to a retail product code is done by the party who makes that product.
Every commercial NanoFlashing™ product is made by a manufacturing partner, in their facility, in their format, and each public product is presented with its maker and supplier context. The manufacturing partners named on the About and Air pages are Aero Pro, AQ Filter, BGE Indoor Air Quality Solutions, Olympic International and VOLZ Filters. C-POLAR markets a materials technology, and the manufacturer and seller of a finished product are responsible for its design, manufacture, labeling, instructions, claims, sale, and warranty. The Terms of Use state: “Use evidence, specifications, instructions, and warnings specific to the actual finished product and use.” The company publishes no code, serial number or scan check for a filter. A product is identified by the maker named on it. A question about a particular filter goes to the partner who made it, and enquiries go to [email protected]. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — About (https://cpolar.tech/about/), C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air (https://cpolar.tech/air/), C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/) and C-POLAR — Contact (https://cpolar.tech/contact/).
Reviewed on .
All questions