Can a buyer distinguish unauthorised relabelling from an approved private-label arrangement?
Last reviewed: .
Can a buyer distinguish unauthorised relabelling from an approved private-label arrangement?
The difference is written permission; the company publishes no list of private-label arrangements, and the partners it names are Aero Pro, AQ Filter, BGE Indoor Air Quality Solutions, Olympic International and VOLZ Filters, which its About page lists as manufacturing partners and its Air page as ReinFire™ manufacturing and distribution partners.
The Terms of Use state: “Nothing on the Site authorizes anyone to manufacture, integrate, market, resell, or describe a product as C-POLAR-enabled. Nothing authorizes anyone to describe itself as a C-POLAR partner. Written permission is required.” They also state: “Only an express written warranty that identifies C-POLAR as the warrantor creates a C-POLAR warranty.” and “A warranty, manual, statement, order confirmation, or other document issued only by a manufacturer, seller, distributor, or other third party does not bind C-POLAR.” C-POLAR markets a materials technology, and the manufacturer and seller of a finished product are responsible for its design, manufacture, labeling, instructions, claims, sale, and warranty. A question about a particular label goes to [email protected]. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/), C-POLAR — About (https://cpolar.tech/about/), C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air (https://cpolar.tech/air/) and C-POLAR — Contact (https://cpolar.tech/contact/).
Reviewed on .
All questions