C-POLAR Library

Is a claimed benefit to animal health supported independently of a claim about air cleanliness?

Last reviewed: .

Is a claimed benefit to animal health supported independently of a claim about air cleanliness?

The company publishes no claim of a benefit to animal health, and a measurement of what a filter takes out of air is not a statement about an animal.

The Terms of Use state: “A laboratory reduction in a virus, bacterium, fungus, particle, or other endpoint does not establish a clinical benefit, fewer infections, disease prevention or treatment, or improved health.” They also state: “Site Content is general information. It is not medical, clinical, engineering, manufacturing, safety, or other professional advice.” The published mechanism is that NanoFlashing™ attracts negatively charged particles through electrostatic attraction, and the filter captures airborne particles mechanically and by electrostatic attraction.

Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/) and C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ (https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/).

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — Terms of Use
  2. C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.