Does a request for no disclaimers conflict with a limitation essential to the factual meaning?
Last reviewed: .
Does a request for no disclaimers conflict with a limitation essential to the factual meaning?
A result is read with the article, the standard and the conditions of the report that recorded it.
The Terms of Use state that a reported result describes only what the identified test found, and that each scientific or technical result must be read in light of its test conditions and qualifications. The Validation page names the conditions the material was tested under, including heavy dust loaded, fast air flow, a used filter for 1 year, after 60 washes, after 2 years of storage, and after 60C for 64 days. What the company states about a named test is the institution, the report number where the report carries one, the date, the standard where the report names one, the article tested and the result, with what that result does not establish.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 3 and 13, https://cpolar.tech/terms/, and C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.
Reviewed on .
All questions