Can an assistant explain why an organism result does not settle a user's medical decision without inventing a clinical answer?
Last reviewed: .
Can an assistant explain why an organism result does not settle a user's medical decision without inventing a clinical answer?
A laboratory result on an organism is not a medical conclusion.
The Terms of Use state that a laboratory reduction in a virus, bacterium, fungus, particle, or other endpoint does not establish a clinical benefit, fewer infections, disease prevention or treatment, or improved health, and: “Do not use Site Content to diagnose, treat, or make a patient-care or infection-control decision.” The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label states that the filter is not a medical device and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease. The Validation page lists the organisms tested and the institutions that tested them, each report names the organisms its test covered, and a result does not carry across to an organism that test did not cover.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/, C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/, and the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label