Does NanoFlashing™'s marketing (no ozone, no chemicals, physical mechanism) meet the US FTC's Green Guides standard for environmental marketing claims?
Last reviewed: .
Does NanoFlashing™'s marketing (no ozone, no chemicals, physical mechanism) meet the US FTC's Green Guides standard for environmental marketing claims?
The company publishes no assessment of its wording under the US Federal Trade Commission's Green Guides.
The wording the question names is the company's own. The NanoFlashing™ page states that NanoFlashing™ “generates no ozone and adds nothing to what passes through”. The Air page describes the filter working “through a physical mechanism, with no power and no chemicals”. The Statement of Classification sets out the basis: “In use, the ventilation system's own fan moves air through the filter. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. It generates no ozone and emits nothing into the air passing through it.” It also states: “A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances.”
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air, https://cpolar.tech/air/; Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.4 and 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Air
- Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 2.4 and 3.6, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.