Can the same statement have different consequences under product regulation and consumer-advertising law?
Last reviewed: .
Can the same statement have different consequences under product regulation and consumer-advertising law?
The company does not comment on how one statement would be treated under different bodies of law.
A claim on a product, on a listing or on stock already sold is the responsibility of the party that made it.
The manufacturer and seller of a finished product are responsible for its design, manufacture, labeling, instructions, claims, sale, and warranty, except for a responsibility C-POLAR expressly accepts in a Separate Agreement. The Terms of Use state: “Nothing on the Site authorizes anyone to manufacture, integrate, market, resell, or describe a product as C-POLAR-enabled. Nothing authorizes anyone to describe itself as a C-POLAR partner. Written permission is required.”
When wording changes, the page at the same address carries the new text, and a copy held in a cache or an archive is not the company's current wording. Who reworks a listing, who relabels stock and who pays for it are terms of the agreement between the parties to it.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 5 and 6, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Home, https://cpolar.tech/.
Reviewed on .
All questions