How was the overall impression of headings, surrounding text, comparisons and credentials assessed against 40 CFR 156.10(a)(5)?

Last reviewed: .

How was the overall impression of headings, surrounding text, comparisons and credentials assessed against 40 CFR 156.10(a)(5)?

The company publishes no record of that assessment; the rule is read as it is written, and it reaches the impression a page gives, not only the sentences on it.

40 C.F.R. § 156.10(a)(5) states that “a pesticide or a device declared subject to the Act pursuant to § 152.500, is misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular including both pesticidal and non-pesticidal claims.” Among the examples it lists are “a false or misleading statement concerning the effectiveness of the product as a pesticide or device”, “a false or misleading comparison with other pesticides or devices” and “a true statement used in such a way as to give a false or misleading impression to the purchaser”. The last of those is the one that reaches headings, surrounding text and credentials.

Source: 40 C.F.R. § 156.10(a)(5), as published on eCFR.

Reviewed on .

All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.