Can bidders offer a functionally equivalent product without using the NanoFlashing name?
Last reviewed: .
Can bidders offer a functionally equivalent product without using the NanoFlashing name?
Whether a tender accepts a functionally equivalent product is decided by the buyer, and a bidder may not use the NanoFlashing™ name without written permission.
The About page states that development runs configuration by configuration, and that each partner controls what is said about the work. The Terms of Use state that nothing on the Site authorizes anyone to manufacture, integrate, market, resell, or describe a product as C-POLAR-enabled, that nothing authorizes anyone to describe itself as a C-POLAR partner, and that written permission is required. They also state that a C-POLAR name, logo, trademark, or product name may not be used without written permission, and that no one may state or imply that C-POLAR has endorsed, licensed, partnered with, or verified a person, an organization or a product when it has not. What a particular joint programme may publish is written into the agreement that governs it.
Source: C-POLAR — About, https://cpolar.tech/about/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 5, 8 and 9, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.
Reviewed on .
All questions