Does a claim about better sleep have evidence separate from particle filtration?
Last reviewed: .
Does a claim about better sleep have evidence separate from particle filtration?
No, the company makes no claim about sleep and publishes no evidence for one.
NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through. The Terms of Use state that a laboratory reduction in a virus, bacterium, fungus, particle, or other endpoint does not establish a clinical benefit, fewer infections, disease prevention or treatment, or improved health, and: “Do not use Site Content to diagnose, treat, or make a patient-care or infection-control decision.” The NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label states that the filter is not a medical device and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease. The Validation page lists the organisms tested, and a result does not carry across to an organism its own test did not cover. A laboratory result on an organism is not a medical conclusion.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, section 3, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label