Could a Malaysian halal claim require composition and process evidence separate from antimicrobial performance?

Could a Malaysian halal claim require composition and process evidence separate from antimicrobial performance?

The company publishes no halal certification and no position under Malaysian law.

The company sets out its position under United States law and under Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, and under no other country's law. Under United States law the company classifies the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter as a device under Section 2(h) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. § 136(h), and 40 C.F.R. § 152.500(a). Under Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 the company classifies the filter as neither a biocidal product nor a treated article. No authority has approved, registered, cleared or endorsed the filter. The company classifies its own article. The company publishes no composition of any kind, and it states no amount of anything applied to anything. The mechanism the company states is the same in both statements. NanoFlashing™ is a permanent positive polarity engineered into filter media itself. It is a physical property of the filter. A charge is a physical property. It is not a substance or a mixture of substances. What a halal assessment requires is set by the body that makes it.

Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 3.7 and 4.1, issued by NF Technical Products Inc.; Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, sections 3.7, 5.1 and 5.2, C-POLAR Technologies, Inc., 11 September 2026.

Reviewed on 21 September 2026.