How are unsupported questions shown without presenting a lack of evidence as a positive product assurance?
Last reviewed: .
How are unsupported questions shown without presenting a lack of evidence as a positive product assurance?
A question the company has published no evidence for is answered with a plain statement of that, and never with silence or a label.
What is published with an answer is the source it comes from and the date it was reviewed. An answer that records what the company has not published is not an assurance about the product.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/) and C-POLAR — Contact (https://cpolar.tech/contact/).
This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.
Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.