Can a technical reviewer flag a legal statement without being presented as its legal approver?
Last reviewed: .
Can a technical reviewer flag a legal statement without being presented as its legal approver?
An answer names its source, and it does not name an approver.
The company names the source of what it publishes, by the company page and its address or by the institution, the report number where the report carries one, the date and the standard where the report names one. Where a source is the company's own record rather than a public one, the answer says whose record it is.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/) and C-POLAR — Contact (https://cpolar.tech/contact/).
This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.
Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.