Has any reported favorable official comment been described to investors as a written reversal or clearance, and what supports that description?

Has any reported favorable official comment been described to investors as a written reversal or clearance, and what supports that description?

Where the company quotes an authority, it carries that authority's conditions with the quotation.

One such statement the company quotes is this. On 22 October 2025 a Member of the European Parliament put a written question to the European Commission on Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 and filtration technologies, describing “technologies with a physical effect (e.g., permanent electrostatic charge or ‘NanoFlashing’)”. On 16 December 2025 the Commission answered: “The Commission considers that mere filtration systems which do not use any active substance would not be covered by the scope of Regulation (EU) 528/2012 (BPR), as the regulation excludes products acting by ‘mere physical or mechanical action’ (Article 3(1)(a)).” The Commission added that “an action which is physical, but also biological/chemical, remains within the scope of the BPR”. Both sentences are the Commission's, and the second travels with the first every time the first is quoted. The question named the technology. The Commission's answer did not name the company or the product. It is a general statement of how the Commission reads its own regulation, given in answer to a question; it is not an approval and not a decision about this product.

Source: European Parliament, question for written answer E-004160/2025/rev.1, tabled 22 October 2025; answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission, 16 December 2025; Statement of Regulatory Status for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 3.6.

Reviewed on 21 September 2026.