Can a claimed cost advantage survive a realistic rate of field returns?
Last reviewed: .
Can a claimed cost advantage survive a realistic rate of field returns?
The filter is a replaceable item with a printed replacement point, and the company publishes no return rate and no cost study; the one building energy measurement it publishes is a before-and-after reading at one building in London.
The filter itself is a replaceable item: its label directs that it not be washed or reused, and that it be replaced at the pressure drop or the interval printed on the product, whichever comes first. Parts and service for the equipment around it come from the maker of that equipment. C-POLAR markets a materials technology, and the manufacturer and seller of a finished product are responsible for its design, manufacture, labeling, instructions, claims, sale, and warranty. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/); C-POLAR — Validation (https://cpolar.tech/validation/).
Reviewed on .
Sources
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- C-POLAR — Validation