Can a generic descriptive term be used without implying a relationship with the brand owner?
Last reviewed: .
Can a generic descriptive term be used without implying a relationship with the brand owner?
A descriptive word used descriptively is not a use of the company's name, and the Terms of Use set what may not be implied.
The Terms of Use are explicit. Nothing on the Site authorizes anyone to manufacture, integrate, market, resell, or describe a product as C-POLAR-enabled. They state that a C-POLAR name, logo, trademark, or product name may not be used without written permission, and that no one may imply that C-POLAR endorses a person or a product. Permission is given in writing or it is not given. NanoFlashing™ is a technology; the name, rating and sale of a product that carries it are set by that product's maker and seller.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use (https://cpolar.tech/terms/).
This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.
Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.