Does a failed field test trigger review of claims based only on laboratory data?

Last reviewed: .

Does a failed field test trigger review of claims based only on laboratory data?

A field measurement and a laboratory test measure different things, and the company keeps them apart.

The Validation page reports laboratory testing separately from its field observations, which are measurements taken at working sites with MicronView’s 405 nm Bio-fluorescent Air Monitoring System. Results in a building depend on the system, the airflow, and how well the filter fits its track. Air that passes around a filter is not treated by it. The Terms of Use state that the evidence, specifications, instructions and warnings to rely on are those specific to the actual finished product and use.

Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — Validation
  2. NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
  3. C-POLAR — Terms of Use
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.