What comparisons does the Validation page describe for its field observations?
Last reviewed: .
What comparisons does the Validation page describe for its field observations?
The Validation page describes four field comparisons.
At a public hospital in Vancouver, over twelve months from July 2023 to July 2024, two identical towers were compared, one on conventional medical grade filters and one on NanoFlashing™. At a financial landmark in London, over six months from March 2024 to September 2024; at a major international airport in the United States, over one month in August 2025; and at a public university in Melbourne, over one month in October 2024, measurements were made before and after the air handling unit filters were changed to NanoFlashing™. The page states that the measurements were made independently with MicronView’s 405 nm Bio-fluorescent Air Monitoring System, which distinguishes biological particles from inert dust in real time, and it counts 441 facilities, 7 countries and 19 sites measured since 2020. These are measurements taken at working sites, not laboratory tests. Results in a building depend on the system, the airflow, and how well the filter fits its track.
Source: C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — Validation
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label