Can a claimed absence of leaching be distinguished from release below a test's detection limit?
Last reviewed: .
Can a claimed absence of leaching be distinguished from release below a test's detection limit?
The company publishes no leaching study and no mass balance.
The company's statement on release is about the air in use, not about leaching or manufacture: the Statement of Classification states, “It generates no ozone and emits nothing into the air passing through it.”
A materials review that needs more than the company's published pages is arranged in writing, through [email protected] on the Contact page.
Source: Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, NF Technical Products Inc., section 2.4; C-POLAR — Contact, https://cpolar.tech/contact/.
Reviewed on .
Sources
Statement of Classification for the NanoFlashing™ Air Filter, section 2.4, NF Technical Products Inc.
This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.
Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.