Can I compare products when one publishes full performance curves and the other publishes only a peak result?

Last reviewed: .

Can I compare products when one publishes full performance curves and the other publishes only a peak result?

The company publishes its filtration measurement size by size across the measured range on the NanoFlashing™ page, and each headline value on the Ultrafine Particles and Wildfire Smoke pages is stated with what it measured.

The size-by-size table on the NanoFlashing™ page names no report. The smoke and ultrafine-particle reports named on the Validation page are LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J. LMS Technologies' Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471 of 20 October 2025 measured single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct. Report 6847 is on a 24 × 24 × 30 in. pocket filter; a rating belongs to the construction that was tested. The published position is that industry standards ASHRAE 52.2 Appendix J and ISO 16890 test electrostatic filters after their temporary charge is removed, showing how they perform without it.

Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Ultrafine Particles, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/ultrafine-particles/; C-POLAR — Wildfire Smoke, https://cpolar.tech/contaminants/wildfire-smoke/; LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J; LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct. A copy may be made available on our review of the request.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
  2. C-POLAR — Validation
  3. C-POLAR — Ultrafine Particles
  4. C-POLAR — Wildfire Smoke
  5. LMS Technologies, Report LMS#9904, 28 April 2025, a single-pass fractional efficiency test on a 24 × 24 × 2 in. pleated air filter in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct, in accordance with standard LMS aerosol test procedures, and Report 6847, ASHRAE 52.2 with Appendix J
  6. LMS Technologies, Inc., Pine-Needle Smoke Report LMS#10471, 20 October 2025, single-pass fractional efficiency in an ASHRAE 52.2 test duct
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.