Can a comparison with ultraviolet treatment account for the complete system's operating requirements?
Last reviewed: .
Can a comparison with ultraviolet treatment account for the complete system's operating requirements?
Yes, when it counts what each option needs to run: ultraviolet light needs a lamp and runs on electricity, while the filter draws no power and has no lamp.
NanoFlashing™ is passive. It generates no ozone, releases nothing, and adds nothing to what passes through. In a forced-air system, the system's own fan moves air through the filter, and its resistance adds to the pressure the fan works against. The filter is passive. It draws no power, and it has no power supply, electrode, lamp or reservoir. Maintenance is the replacement of the filter itself, at the pressure drop and the interval stated on the product's own label. Where C-POLAR's pages compare NanoFlashing™ with other filters, they compare it with conventional filters as a class and name no competitor's model. A comparison means something only when both products are measured at the same airflow and under the same standard. This site publishes no noise measurement, no price and no running cost. General enquiries go to [email protected].
Source: C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™, https://cpolar.tech/nanoflashing/; C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/; C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Water, https://cpolar.tech/water/; NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label.
Reviewed on .
Sources
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™
- C-POLAR — Validation
- C-POLAR — Terms of Use
- NanoFlashing™ Air Filter label
- C-POLAR — NanoFlashing™ Water