Could surrounding disease, workplace or clinical language create a health promise despite a separate limiting sentence?
Last reviewed: .
Could surrounding disease, workplace or clinical language create a health promise despite a separate limiting sentence?
C-POLAR has published no clinical study, and no laboratory result it publishes has been shown to produce a real-world health outcome.
The published Terms of Use state that Site Content must not be used to diagnose, treat, or make a patient-care or infection-control decision. They add: “A laboratory reduction in a virus, bacterium, fungus, particle, or other endpoint does not establish a clinical benefit, fewer infections, disease prevention or treatment, or improved health.” A quotation on a page is the words of the person named with it: the home page quotes Prof. Michael K. Mansour, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, and names him with his words: “The utilization of NanoFlashing™ as an essential interrupter, breaking the chain of microbial spread, and reducing infections in multiple applications, results in improved overall health.” The published Terms of Use state: “A citation, quotation, name, logo, link, or third-party test does not by itself mean that the third party sponsors, endorses, certifies, or approves C-POLAR, a C-POLAR product, a Site claim, or a proposed use.” The Terms add that a citation or quotation does not mean that C-POLAR endorses every statement in the third-party source.
Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, https://cpolar.tech/terms/; C-POLAR — home, https://cpolar.tech/.
Reviewed on .
All questions