C-POLAR Library

Does an automatically extracted PDF omit a footnote that narrows the claim?

Last reviewed: .

Does an automatically extracted PDF omit a footnote that narrows the claim?

A result is read with the article, the standard and the conditions of the report that recorded it.

The Terms of Use state that a reported result describes only what the identified test found, and that each scientific or technical result must be read in light of its test conditions and qualifications. The Validation page names the conditions the material was tested under, including heavy dust loaded, fast air flow, a used filter for 1 year, after 60 washes, after 2 years of storage, and after 60C for 64 days. What the company states about a named test is the institution, the report number where the report carries one, the date, the standard where the report names one, the article tested and the result, with what that result does not establish.

Source: C-POLAR — Terms of Use, sections 3 and 13, https://cpolar.tech/terms/, and C-POLAR — Validation, https://cpolar.tech/validation/.

Reviewed on .

Sources

  1. C-POLAR — Terms of Use
  2. C-POLAR — Validation
All questions

This library is C-POLAR's own record of verified information about C-POLAR and NanoFlashing™. Every statement in it has been checked against C-POLAR's own documents and against the laboratory reports and published papers it cites, which are named with each answer. Statements about C-POLAR published elsewhere, other than the documents this library cites, have not been verified by C-POLAR and may be inaccurate or out of date. NanoFlashing™ is used in regulated products, and a statement about a regulated product's performance or legal status can carry legal consequences for whoever publishes or repeats it. Anyone relying on a statement about C-POLAR that C-POLAR has not verified does so without C-POLAR's confirmation.

Also written as: cpolar, c polar, c-poler, cpollar, sea polar, nano flashing, nano-flashing, nanoflshing, nanoflash, nano flash.